NeurIPS 2026

ReSMapRecasting Satellite Priors for Robust and Accurate Online HD Map Construction

Kyungmin Kim*, Sumin Lee*, Sungoh Jeong, DoHyun Lim, Seonghyun Park, Soonmin Hwang†

IRCV Lab, Hanyang University

*Equal contribution   †Corresponding author

1Abstract

Despite recent advances in camera-based online HD map construction, these systems remain susceptible to sensor failures because of their reliance on onboard cameras. Satellite images, in contrast, remain available independently of real-time sensing conditions, since they are cached offline. Existing methods that use satellite images, however, primarily leverage them under nominal conditions, without explicitly addressing them as redundancy when a sensor degrades.

We propose ReSMap, a redundancy-aware camera–satellite fusion framework for robust online HD map construction. A Predict-then-Fuse (PTF) module fuses camera and satellite BEV features using each branch’s own prediction confidence as a per-pixel reliability weight, with no learned router. An Object-Centric Cooperative Multi-modal Query (OCMQ) decoder then propagates this isolation to the query level: each modality cross-attends only to its own BEV, and per-modality updates are merged through a learned per-token gate.

ReSMap achieves state-of-the-art performance on nuScenes across all splits and range settings. More importantly, it also sets a new state of the art under camera-failure scenarios, demonstrating that satellite images serve not only as a strong prior but as practical redundancy for robust online HD mapping.

Watch the cameras fail

Scroll to take the cameras away: the front one, then the three at the front, then all six.

Clean all six cameras reporting
Surround camera coverage around the ego vehicle, with failed cameras darkened and the satellite prior taking over
The six surround cameras, and behind them the geo-aligned satellite tile. As cameras go dark the PTF gate moves its weight onto the satellite branch, which the fault does not touch.

    mAP on the geographically non-overlapping split of nuScenes at 60 × 30 m, for ReSMap with temporal modelling. Every value shown is measured: the chart steps between the four drop levels rather than interpolating, and the ticks on each lane mark that method’s four measurements.

    Every number in that is measured: they are the figures in Table 2, read one drop level at a time. The camera-only model is the clearest case: it has nothing else to read, so at the last step there is essentially no map left. The LiDAR-fused baselines degrade more gracefully, losing roughly a quarter to a third, because their second sensor is genuinely a second sensor. The SD-fused one does not: a road graph is too coarse to carry lane-level geometry, so it is down 84.5% by the last step. ReSMap leads at every step, and with no camera left it is still ahead of the two baselines that keep their LiDAR.

    2Method

    LiDAR is bolted to the same onboard stack that fails, and SD maps carry topology but not lane-level geometry. A satellite tile is different in the one way that matters: it is fetched and cached before the drive, so no onboard fault can take it away. Two pieces spend that, one at the pixel and one at the query.

    ReSMap architecture: camera and satellite encoders produce separate BEV features, the PTF gate fuses them by per-pixel confidence, and the OCMQ decoder merges per-modality query updates.
    Overview. Camera and satellite encoders produce separate BEV features. The PTF gate fuses them by per-pixel segmentation confidence; the OCMQ decoder keeps one shared object-query pool but computes camera-, satellite-, and fused-conditioned updates inside each layer.

    2.1  Predict-then-Fuse

    Each branch segments the BEV on its own, and how confident it is at a pixel becomes that branch’s weight at that pixel. The weight is detached from the gradient, so the fusion never learns a preference between the two:

    Ffuse(x)=rcam(x)⁢Fcam(x)+rsat(x)⁢Fsat(x)rcam(x)+rsat(x)+ε

    We call this the Self-Confidence Gate. The fallback is a closed-form property rather than a learned behaviour: as rcam → 0, the fused feature converges to the satellite feature. Because the gating signal is a prediction confidence and not a raw-image statistic, it also holds up under failures never seen in training, such as cameras zeroed at inference.

    Per-pixel and per-query gate response under camera dropout.
    Gate response under camera dropout. Left: over active BEV cells, removing all cameras collapses rcam while rsat rises to cover the same regions. Right: the same routing appears at the query level: the per-token gate shifts negatively for 98% of queries, with the largest drops on those that were most camera-reliant in the clean run.

    2.2  Object-Centric Cooperative Multi-modal Query decoder

    A standard DETR-style map decoder undoes this isolation: every query reads from a shared key/value pool that already mixes the three BEVs. The naive fix, one query pool per modality, is worse, because Hungarian matching then routes each ground-truth instance to whichever pool already explains it best, entangling classes with modalities. Dividers and boundaries become camera-only skills, crossings a fusion-only one; when a modality fails, no other branch was ever supervised to take over.

    OCMQ keeps a single object-query pool, so the matcher only ever sees one unified set, and builds the modality-specific updates inside each decoder layer instead. Three copies of the query set, each offset by a learnable modality embedding, cross-attend only to their own BEV, and a per-token softmax gate merges them back into one query. There is deliberately no residual to the previous layer, which a down-weighted modality would otherwise re-enter through and accumulate over. Every class therefore receives gradients from all three modalities, while contamination at inference is still controlled per token.

    Comparison of a naive per-branch query design against the OCMQ design under Hungarian matching.
    Why one query pool. With independent per-modality pools (left), bipartite matching routes each ground-truth element to the strongest modality only. OCMQ (right) merges per-modality updates through a per-token gate, so every class absorbs camera, satellite, and fused gradients.

    3Quantitative results

    The main benchmark is the geographically non-overlapping split of nuScenes, where training and validation cover different parts of each city; the tabs over each table switch to nuScenes’ original split and to Argoverse 2. On nuScenes the satellite input is ego-aligned AID4AD tiles cropped to the BEV region of interest, on Argoverse 2 our own tiles from Google Maps. Except where marked, every baseline is retrained under the same evaluation conditions, following its own paper’s schedule.

    3.1  Clean conditions

    APp, APd and APb are average precision on pedestrian crossings, lane dividers and road boundaries, each averaged over Chamfer-distance thresholds of 0.5, 1.0 and 1.5 m (1.0, 1.5 and 2.0 m at 100 × 50 m); mAP is the mean of the three.

    Online HD map construction performance on the geographically non-overlapping split of nuScenes.
    MethodVenueMod.Temp.Ep. APpAPdAPbmAPFPS
    60 × 30 m
    MapTracker†ECCV’24C✓5845.930.045.140.313.5
    MapTRv2IJCV’24C+L11018.829.561.736.67.3
    DAMapICCV’25C+L11019.232.866.139.47.2
    SDTagNetNeurIPS’25C+SD11011.725.340.525.89.6
    PriorDrive‡AAAI’26C+SD+HD✓11044.735.547.342.58.2
    SatforHDMapICRA’24C+SA11044.112.124.827.014.1
    ReSMap (ours)NeurIPS’26C+SA2463.130.048.947.316.1
    ReSMap (ours)NeurIPS’26C+SA✓2469.536.658.754.910.2
    100 × 50 m
    MapTracker†ECCV’24C✓5845.924.338.436.213.4
    MapTRv2IJCV’24C+L2416.627.645.029.87.6
    DAMapICCV’25C+L2413.727.648.730.07.2
    SDTagNetNeurIPS’25C+SD3011.925.530.822.78.4
    SatforHDMapICRA’24C+SA2440.09.910.420.114.2
    ReSMap (ours)NeurIPS’26C+SA2474.530.244.949.915.9
    ReSMap (ours)NeurIPS’26C+SA✓2477.635.051.354.710.2

    Table 1. Online HD map construction on the geographically non-overlapping split. C, L, SD, HD, SA denote camera, LiDAR, SD map, prior HD map, and satellite images; Temp. marks temporal memory or historical-prediction priors. FPS is measured on a single RTX 4090. †Consistent-GT supervision. ‡Numbers taken from the original paper. PriorDrive (C+SD+HD) uses an SD map together with a noisy prior HD map and online local maps from earlier traversals. Best per column in bold.

    The margin grows with range. At 60 × 30 m ReSMap leads the best prior method by 12.4 mAP; at 100 × 50 m, where camera evidence thins out with distance, by 18.5. The satellite branch is cheap to carry: with temporal memory ReSMap runs at 10.2 FPS, faster than every LiDAR- and SD-fused method, and without it at 16.1 FPS, faster than the camera-only baseline while still ahead of it by 7.0 mAP.

    3.2  Camera failure

    Robustness is measured by zeroing the front camera, the three front cameras, and all six cameras at inference time, replacing each dropped view with a blackout image.

    Robustness under camera dropout on the geographically non-overlapping split of nuScenes.
    MethodMod.Temp.Ep. CleanFront-1Front-3All
    MapTracker†C✓5840.323.0 −42.9%10.8 −73.2%0.1 −99.8%
    MapTRv2C+L11036.632.2 −12.0%29.5 −19.4%23.8 −35.0%
    DAMapC+L11039.435.8 −9.1%34.2 −13.2%29.2 −25.9%
    SDTagNetC+SD11025.819.8 −23.3%14.5 −43.8%4.0 −84.5%
    SatforHDMapC+SA11027.021.5 −20.4%21.3 −21.1%14.3 −47.0%
    ReSMap (ours)C+SA2447.344.2 −6.6%42.6 −9.9%40.1 −15.2%
    ReSMap (ours)C+SA✓2454.950.3 −8.4%45.1 −17.9%32.9 −40.1%

    Table 2. Camera dropout at 60 × 30 m on the geographically non-overlapping split. Front-1, Front-3, and All zero out the front camera, the three front cameras, and all six cameras at inference. Each cell shows mAP and the relative change from clean. †Consistent-GT supervision. Best per column in bold.

    4Qualitative results

    Pick a scene, then switch the range and turn cameras off while it plays: every method's map changes on the same frame. Grey lines are the ground truth.

    Front left
    Front
    Front right
    Back left
    Back
    Back right
    Satellite tile around the vehicle
    Satellite tile
    60 × 30 m
    MapTracker
    Camera
    DAMap
    Camera + LiDAR
    SDTagNet
    Camera + SD map
    SatforHDMap
    Camera + satellite
    ReSMap (ours)
    Camera + satellite
    Frame 1 / 41
    Ped. crossingLane dividerRoad boundary

    nuScenes, geographically non-overlapping split; 2 frames per second at 1×. Zoom with the buttons, a pinch or a double click, and drag to look around; every panel follows.

    5Paper

    ReSMap: Recasting Satellite Priors for Robust and Accurate Online HD Map Construction

    NeurIPS 2026

    The camera-ready PDF goes up here once it is final.

    Download PDF (soon)

    @inproceedings{kim2026resmap,
      title     = {ReSMap: Recasting Satellite Priors for Robust and
                   Accurate Online HD Map Construction},
      author    = {Kim, Kyungmin and Lee, Sumin and Jeong, Sungoh and
                   Lim, DoHyun and Park, Seonghyun and Hwang, Soonmin},
      booktitle = {Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems
                   (NeurIPS)},
      year      = {2026}
    }

    Page and volume numbers follow once the proceedings appear. Satellite imagery is the ego-aligned AID4AD release on nuScenes and our own Google Maps crops on Argoverse 2; both datasets are used under their non-commercial licences.